njdude26
08-09 04:28 PM
Im currently in my 8th year H1 extension. I will file for my 9th year extension ( 1yr extension) and get it stamped in December. Then I will be outside the country for a year and will come back in next december'07. At that time can i file an extension and get a 3 year extension since i have been out of the country for a year ? If my labor gets approved and 140 gets approved then i know i will be able to do it but if the labor is still stuck....
wallpaper الا للحبيب الاولي. 29379
informvinay
12-13 02:56 PM
Hi,
I was on H1 VISA when my wife came here on H4 VISA. When I was filled her DS-157 form for H4 Stamping by mistake I put the wrong dates of employment.
Now she got her H1 Visa approved when she was here in US. She is going for H1 Visa stamping . She is filling her DS-157 again with the correct dates. Would it be a problem. Would H4 DS-157 be tied back to DS-157 for H1 while she is there for H1 Stamping.
Please any help would be appreciated.
I was on H1 VISA when my wife came here on H4 VISA. When I was filled her DS-157 form for H4 Stamping by mistake I put the wrong dates of employment.
Now she got her H1 Visa approved when she was here in US. She is going for H1 Visa stamping . She is filling her DS-157 again with the correct dates. Would it be a problem. Would H4 DS-157 be tied back to DS-157 for H1 while she is there for H1 Stamping.
Please any help would be appreciated.
rkdownload
04-19 08:38 AM
I have been working as a consultant, due to the tight job market conditions I am not able to find my next contract in bay area, which was my current location when we filed I485 in Aug 2007. So, may be we got to relocate to other state say Texas. So, I was wondering what would be the impact of the move on our pending I485 applications after we change address using AR11 form. Should we avoid such move while I485 is pending?
Any Advice/Suggestions?
Thanks
Raj
Any Advice/Suggestions?
Thanks
Raj
2011 Glitter I Love You Large
STAmisha
06-30 11:46 AM
My company is filing 140 and 485 on a preapproved LC (PD of 2005)
But my original LC in P-BEC just got cleared (PD of 2003). They told that they will also use my original LC for 140 as this gives better chance than the substituted one.
1)How Can I have 2 140's ?
3)How will it effect 485?
I'm confused ..please answer
But my original LC in P-BEC just got cleared (PD of 2003). They told that they will also use my original LC for 140 as this gives better chance than the substituted one.
1)How Can I have 2 140's ?
3)How will it effect 485?
I'm confused ..please answer
more...
suryamnb
12-18 02:15 PM
Hi friends,
Today I had a LUD on my old I-129 (approved in Aug 2005). The online status say: �On August 29, 2007, the post office returned our last written notice on this case as undeliverable. This can have serious effects on the processing of this case. Please call 1-800-375-5283 to update the mailing address so this notice can be re-sent.�
I'm no more working for this employer and I�ve changed to a new employer a year ago. What does this status mean?Any ideas?
Does this cause any problem to my current GC process which was sponsored by current employer?
Today I had a LUD on my old I-129 (approved in Aug 2005). The online status say: �On August 29, 2007, the post office returned our last written notice on this case as undeliverable. This can have serious effects on the processing of this case. Please call 1-800-375-5283 to update the mailing address so this notice can be re-sent.�
I'm no more working for this employer and I�ve changed to a new employer a year ago. What does this status mean?Any ideas?
Does this cause any problem to my current GC process which was sponsored by current employer?
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
more...
kirupa
04-04 09:08 PM
In that case, let's say your Combobox is called cmbBox and your Listbox is called lstBox. The code for displaying all of the items from the Combobox into the Listbox would be:
for (int i = 0; i < cmbBox.Items.Count; i++)
{
lstBox.Items.Add(cmbBox.Items[i]);
}
=)
for (int i = 0; i < cmbBox.Items.Count; i++)
{
lstBox.Items.Add(cmbBox.Items[i]);
}
=)
2010 Graphic: I Love Jesus
Blog Feeds
01-30 06:40 AM
Last week, White House adviser David Axelrod noted that immigration reform would not happen in the near term unless there was bipartisan support. That's really always been the case, but the comment seems consistent with something said this week by Senate Democratic leaders (as noted in an email alert sent by America's Voice today): During a news conference held by Senate Democratic leaders yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and Border Security, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) both made clear their unequivocal support for comprehensive immigration reform and outlined their efforts...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/two-plus-two.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/two-plus-two.html)
more...
GCaspirations
10-16 06:38 PM
I recently got my EAD card. I intent to continue to work full time with my current employer. I want to work part time with another employer. My H1 is stamped and valid untill end of 2008.
If I use my EAD card for part-time job, does my H1 get invalid?
If yes, do I need to inform my fulltime employer about change in status?
If no, can I travel outside USA with the H1 visa for reentry?
Please help.
If I use my EAD card for part-time job, does my H1 get invalid?
If yes, do I need to inform my fulltime employer about change in status?
If no, can I travel outside USA with the H1 visa for reentry?
Please help.
hair love you lots
americandream
07-26 11:03 PM
My PERM was filed on July 18, 2007. PERM got approved on July 26, 2007.
I-140/I-485 concurrent will be filed in first week of august 2007.
Which fee will be applied in this case ? New August filing fee or same July filing fee?
USCIS FAQ are confusing for this scenerio. I am sure lot of people are in the same boat. Kindly let me know what is the right filing fee for this scenerio.
I-140/I-485 concurrent will be filed in first week of august 2007.
Which fee will be applied in this case ? New August filing fee or same July filing fee?
USCIS FAQ are confusing for this scenerio. I am sure lot of people are in the same boat. Kindly let me know what is the right filing fee for this scenerio.
more...
fu3142
06-28 12:00 PM
Hello everybody,
I am a new member. I read some of the posts on this website and know that there are some Singaporeans in this thread who have applied for the H1B1 visa under the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Questions:
1. How long does the process of applying for the USSFTA H1-B1 take?
2. Where is the best place to apply for the USSFTA H1-B1 visa?
Please advise especially if you have already done it. I am about to start the process. Any advice is highly appreciated.
Cheers!!
I am a new member. I read some of the posts on this website and know that there are some Singaporeans in this thread who have applied for the H1B1 visa under the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Questions:
1. How long does the process of applying for the USSFTA H1-B1 take?
2. Where is the best place to apply for the USSFTA H1-B1 visa?
Please advise especially if you have already done it. I am about to start the process. Any advice is highly appreciated.
Cheers!!
hot We Love You Clip Art. in our
�
08-22 09:54 AM
I tried to create a stamp.. pretty pleased with it! Tho its quite scary:-/
Its my brohter btw:P lol
http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/5356/stampoy5.png
Not actually a stamp I'd put on a letter to my grandmother:beam:
Its my brohter btw:P lol
http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/5356/stampoy5.png
Not actually a stamp I'd put on a letter to my grandmother:beam:
more...
house I Love You Clip Art
rakesh05
02-26 04:11 PM
Hi,
I am currently on H1 and it is with company A. I have an offer with company B and want to get my H1 transferred to company B. I have not gotten my H1 stamped since i have received my work authorization. Can i still get my H1 transferred or do i need to get it stamped and only then can i have my H1 transferred.
Thanks in advance.
I am currently on H1 and it is with company A. I have an offer with company B and want to get my H1 transferred to company B. I have not gotten my H1 stamped since i have received my work authorization. Can i still get my H1 transferred or do i need to get it stamped and only then can i have my H1 transferred.
Thanks in advance.
tattoo with extra love, treats,
iinfotech10
08-04 03:44 AM
The Diversity Immigrant Visa program is a United States congressionally-mandated lottery program for receiving a United States Permanent Resident Card. It is also known as the Green Card Lottery. The lottery is administered on an annual basis by the Department of State and conducted under the terms of Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Section 131 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-649) amended INA 203 to provide for a new class of immigrants known as "diversity immigrants" (DV immigrants). The Act makes available 50,000[1] permanent resident visas annually to persons from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States.
__________________________________________________ ____
link building service (http://www.google-seo-top.com)
hearing school (http://www.swardeep.org)
__________________________________________________ ____
link building service (http://www.google-seo-top.com)
hearing school (http://www.swardeep.org)
more...
pictures lovers images clip art. i love
seekerofpeace
04-14 10:36 PM
check this out:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975190063718725.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs
SoP
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975190063718725.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs
SoP
dresses i love you heart drawings
chanduv23
09-16 10:23 AM
Do you know what is team spirit?
Each and everyone contributes for their own cause and collectively contributes for the cause of the community.
IV has built the great platform for you. IV has created all opportunities for you to stand up and speak for yourself.
Everyone can achieve results by working together as a team.
Please start looking beyond your cocoon - you must come out of your closets and show your soladirity.
Come on folks IV is nothing but you. You can make the difference
Each and everyone contributes for their own cause and collectively contributes for the cause of the community.
IV has built the great platform for you. IV has created all opportunities for you to stand up and speak for yourself.
Everyone can achieve results by working together as a team.
Please start looking beyond your cocoon - you must come out of your closets and show your soladirity.
Come on folks IV is nothing but you. You can make the difference
more...
makeup #40860 Clip Art Graphic of a
eager_immi
07-20 03:29 PM
please update your poll to have option done both or neither?
I thought we should have a poll of how many sent cards to senatorr/congressmen/directors etc
Also, how many uploaded the YouTube.
Please delete this thread if it exists already
I thought we should have a poll of how many sent cards to senatorr/congressmen/directors etc
Also, how many uploaded the YouTube.
Please delete this thread if it exists already
girlfriend Wedding car, Wedding clipart
ArkBird
12-13 01:20 PM
Recently I got soft LUD on my approved I-140 which was approved back in April, 2007.
Any ideas what it could be about?
Thanks!
ArkBird
Any ideas what it could be about?
Thanks!
ArkBird
hairstyles heart clip art outline. clip
Blog Feeds
06-25 01:20 AM
Eweek.com reports that H-1B recruiting firms have filed suit against USCIS, DHS over changes to the H-1B presumably related to the Neufeld Memo. *The companies indicate that the government is overstepping its mandate and burdening these specialists with an intrusive and costly ruling that they estimate will cost more than $100 million.
Read article (http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Management/H1B-Recruiting-Companies-File-Lawsuit-over-Rule-Changes-428725/)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/06/24/h1b-recruiting-companies-sue-uscis-dhs-over-changes.aspx?ref=rss)
Read article (http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Management/H1B-Recruiting-Companies-File-Lawsuit-over-Rule-Changes-428725/)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/06/24/h1b-recruiting-companies-sue-uscis-dhs-over-changes.aspx?ref=rss)
cowboyqb
04-07 04:00 PM
Hello all:
Applied for 140 transfer in June '07. Its been 21 months and no news on my 140 transfer.
- Any reason for concern?
- How can I check my 140 transfer status?
- Inputs from anyone who applied during that time frame?
Many Thanks!
Applied for 140 transfer in June '07. Its been 21 months and no news on my 140 transfer.
- Any reason for concern?
- How can I check my 140 transfer status?
- Inputs from anyone who applied during that time frame?
Many Thanks!
wandmaker
12-07 12:31 AM
continuedProgress: AFAIK & IMHO - Only people in valid H/L status can travel outside USA while AP is pending. Your wife is on F1, if she travels outside USA with out the approved AP on hand, her 485 is considered abandoned. You can have second opinion with your attorney.
No comments:
Post a Comment